Drage blant sauer

  Everywhere I look or read, I get embroiled in linguistic discourse on acceptable terms used to refer to autistic people.   I have written many times on this blog that a change in wordage when referring to autistic people is needed. It is a core issue for me, as language shape thoughts and attitudes towards those deemed Other within society. Otherment is due to linguistic difference and already marginalized people are more marginalized by the words that are applied.  Autist , to my mind, carries too much historical weight to be used in polite conversation. The term itself was coined in 1911 by Swiss psychologist Eugen Bleuler, who derived it from Greek autos ‘self’, referring to schizophrenia in the vernacular of the time. In nearly the century since Ukranian pediatrician Grunya Sukhareva wrote of autism (1925), much has been attempted to better the lives of the autistic population. At least in theory. Seldom are autistic people herded into mental institutions; th...

  Naming autistic difference is treated as threat, as it is not to be respected, merely managed. It all started with a phone call. A relative had found a group for autistic people which actually had heard of autistic burnout – success! About as rare a feat in Norway as it is to realize you're surrounded by bears in a dark forest. I was intrigued, but wary. Too many seemingly neurodivergent-friendly spaces turn out to be run with neurotypical sensibilities and measures in mind, even if they say they're not on the tin. Having burned myself too many times on such ventures, amazing I said yes to this one. To have an invisible dynamic disability or a neurological condition is sometimes a struggle. It fluctuates day by day and what seemed effortless on Monday can spell a breakdown on Thursday. I've recently come across (and in the progress of relistening to) the podcast Autistic After Hours (more specifically episodes 23, 30, 42, 74 and 75) and it has put into words some of ...

  Low-waste life ought to be a neurodivergent dream: orderly, enduring and attentive. Yet the movement too often turns ecological care into an ableist purity test. Autistic people rarely do things halfway, in my experience, so helping the planet whilst following a set of rules, regulations and routines sounds lovely. Going zero waste has changed in the last decade or so: From storing all your trash in a mason jar to simply doing the best you can to live your life eco-friendly. Whether that means reusing paper to make art, composting your scraps into arable earth, reusing what you have in your life or reducing plastic, I am of the opinion that every little thing helps the change along. Eco-influencers online (TheSimpleEnvironmentalist, GreenEarthCo, Gittemary Johansen, Shelbizleee and the EcofriendlyUnicorn) are excellent voices to listen to regarding low or zero waste and sustainable living in general. When it comes to eco-ableism within the movement, one needs only take a look...

  Autistic people as burdens has a long history. Described by the Austrian pediatrician Hans Asperger in 1944, his child charges were considered ‘unberable burden[s]’ (Slagstad 2019) to their respective families. Today, autistic individuals are bemoaned by the establishment for being unable to ‘pay taxes’ or ‘write poetry’ (Kile 2025), wretched souls incapable of attaining the benefits of capitalism. They are drains on society and as such must either be thinned or weeded out. Eugenic terms openly being tossed about. ASC must be eradicated wholly from the population, for the sake of the precious children and their overburdened care givers.   The term eugenics means good birth and is openly being discussed regarding autistic individuals, disguised in progressive language as being burdens on society and family. A disease present in the best of families. A tragedy.  An all too common refrain for those who know the tune. In her 2016 book, War on Autism , Anne McGuire ...